“Firm” Believer

Gear, Products Add comments

Pearl Izumi Syncroseek II

Pearl Izumi Syncroseek II after Hard Rock

Hard Rock has come and gone with much success. Success from finishing in my goal time. Success for having a supportive crew and family. Success from the race committee for putting on a spectacular race. And, of course, success from my sponsors for providing the best products.

There are many things that can go wrong in Hard Rock (and any race for that matter). This was my 3rd running of Hard Rock and the two previous times I have had trouble with my feet. The first time I wore the Montrail Hard Rock shoe which provided tremendous protection but didn’t breath and was maybe a little too stiff. The second time I wore the La Sportiva Fireblade which had a stiff bottom but really didn’t provide any protection whatsoever. Both times my feet caused me to slow either from having to empty my shoes of rocks or stopping to pop blisters. Having said that, these are both great shoe companies but they just didn’t work out for me.

La Sportiva Fireblas

Feet after Hard Rock last year

I couldn’t endure the thrashing of my feet again so I took faith in my sponsors shoes - the Pearl Izumi Syncroseek 2. I had trained in these shoes the month leading up to Hard Rock to make sure I wasn’t gonna have any blister issues - check. I also made sure there was enough protection underneath from the rocks - check. And last, I made sure that there was enough ventilation and protection on the uppers - check. The only thing I couldn’t account for was the feet being wet for 30 hours - what was the drainage gonna be like?

I have a fat-flat foot that is especially fat in the fore foot area. Growing up I always had to get triple E shoes to fit my Flintstone feet. Shoes can stretch but only stretch so far. Once they stretch to capacity of it’s structure it’s either gonna rip or resist. When the shoe resists and pushes back I form nasty blisters (as anyone would) on the pressure points. I particularly get blisters under my big toe nails from shoes that have a low profile in the toe box and minimal toe protection.

Going back a few years (2000) to when PI launched their shoe line. I was running road marathons at the time, wearing PI singlets and shorts. I always wanted to look good so getting the shoes to complete the kit was natural. Let me just say the shoes for the first two or three years were tanks! I was turned off and with so many shoes on the market, probably wouldn’t return. Enter Bob Africa. Bob and I met at Red Hot 50K in Moab earlier this year and I noticed he was wearing the new Peak XC that I’d seen in magazines. He had told me of the transformation PI shoes had made over the last several years and to give ‘em a go again… he sent me a pair and to my surprise they were light, flexible, and had a nice roll to them. The rest is history.

Back to Hard Rock and the PI Syncroseek 2. The Syncroseek 2 delivered and here’s why: 1. underneath protection (not too much) 2. flexible 3. nice curve on the sole for a smooth transition 4. upper protection in the toe box 5. upper protection were it meets the sole, and 5. ventilation. Hard Rock offered all the same obstacles: rocks, rocks, rocks, wet feet for 30 hours, fast down hills, and snow as in previous years. But I’m happy to report that the PI Syncroseek 2 did the job that no other shoe could for me. I had minor blisters and wet feet in the end but the shoe provided just the right amount of protection underneath, the right amount protection in the toe box, allowed my feet to breath, and not too bulky. After the race when I started to take my shoes off, my crew gathered round because they remember how bad my feet were last year. This year they were sorely disappointed and didn’t even warrant a picture.

Whatever your reason for NOT wearing PI shoes for all your running events, take my story into consideration and give PI shoes a try (again). Pearl Izumi got it right!  I know you won’t be disappointed…. RUN LIKE AN ANIMAL!

8 Responses to ““Firm” Believer”

  1. Brad Mitchell Says:

    First - A belated congrats on HardRock! Second - Gnarly foot picture. Third - Great push for the PI shoes. I have often looked but haven’t made the move to try a pair. I have a medium wide foot and prefer a shoe with good fore foot width and toe wiggle room. After reading your review I will surely put them on my list to try. this summer has been interesting, I’m about to try my fourth brand of shoes and I have’nt really found one I’m sold on. Thanks for the info. Good luck on the remainder of your summer.

  2. Scott Jaime Says:

    Hey Brad,

    Thanks for the comment. And more importantly congrats on White River! With the short amount of time you had to prepare, that was a great result! Great result no matter what!

    As far as the shoe goes, the Syncroseek 2 provides a little more protection than most runners like but was perfect for me during Hard Rock. The shoe that I think you will really, really like is the Peak XC. Very light and flexible. PI shoes have truly been transformed and I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.

    Good luck with the rest of your season!

    Scott Jaime

  3. jd Says:

    heya, so i have been running with PI SS 2 but seems they have stopped making them and am in market for new shoe. saw the PI peak XC. how are they compared to PI syncroseek 2?

  4. admin Says:

    jd
    Thanks for the question. The Seek II has been replaced with a new and improved Seek III. The Peak XC is a lower profile, more minimalistic version of the Seek.
    Here is a response from our team member Scott Jaime who uses both:
    two totally different shoes. I use both but for different reasons. The SS in a much beefier shoe with substantial protection underneath and on the side walls. The sole is much stiffer as well. The XC is built for speed and “should” be used for shorter races (50K and less) with smoother trails. The XC also has a more flexible sole with a great role to it. Not much tread or protection offered anywhere on the shoe - like I said the XC is built for speed and should only be worn after training in it awhile. Because they are so light the foot is worked much more and tends to get tired to the untrained foot. XC never would have worked for Hard Rock. SS never would have worked for Leadville. …for me anyways.
    I hope that helpd jd.
    Cheers!

  5. jd Says:

    another question.

    I used the SS 2 as a gym shoe also in addition to running. but as winter approaches, it becomes harder to run outside, would I be able to use the XC as a gym shoe for weight training and running on treadmill and on elliptical.

  6. Scott Jaime Says:

    Yes. You will love the roll of the shoe as well as how light it feels. Besides it looks good too! Perfect for the gym and treadmill.

  7. jd Says:

    hey sorry about the wrong info.

    i had the original SS: Model 5125

    http://www.pearlizumi.com/product.php?mode=view&product_id=655&type_id=1&spo

    since they no longer make them am looking for a replacement PI. used these in gym, running and they fit like a glove.

  8. Scott Jaime Says:

    you’ll love the peak XC. They’ll put a spring in your step

Leave a Reply

Modified N.Design Glossy Blue Theme by BornTall Media
Email Login Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in